Families' Anguish Over Coastal Degradation Endangering Norfolk Graves
Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.
A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards
The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”
Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Haunted by the Past
One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.
“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”
“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Grave in Peril
Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.
“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”
In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”
Seeking Solutions and Clarity
An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.
Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is drawing near.
“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”
A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”
It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”
The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.