🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has claimed to have scraped a vast number of tracks from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to release them online.

Possible Boost for Artificial Intelligence Development

Industry experts noted the apparent data breach could aid AI companies looking for material to develop their technology.

A group called Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million music files from the platform and 256 million entries of associated data such as artist and album names. The company, which carries more than 100 million tracks, stated that the breach did not represent its entire catalog.

“We have located and disabled the malicious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” said a Spotify representative.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorised access found a third party scraped public metadata and employed illicit methods to circumvent DRM protections.

Archive's Stated Goal and Worries

The streaming service does not believe the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to copyright-infringing books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group asserted the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a method of exchanging large data files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s information and culture”.

AI Training and Copyright Debate

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ copyright, said the leaked music would probably be utilized for developing AI models.

“Training on illegally sourced data is unfortunately widespread in the AI industry, so this stolen music is highly likely to end up instructing AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site alludes to a large online archive, a huge online repository of pirated books that has reportedly been leveraged by Meta to develop its AI models.

The co-founder of an AI startup wrote on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in principle “build their own private free version of the service”. The executive said it could also allow technology firms to “educate models on modern music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a key issue between creatives, authors and creatives on one side and tech giants on the other.

Government Considerations and Responses

Across Britain, artists and writers have raised concerns against a government suggestion to let AI companies use copyright-protected work without permission unless the owner opts out. Virtually every participant to a government call for evidence on the proposal has backed artists’ apprehensions.

A government minister for technology, innovation and development informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the matter, noting that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The administration has committed to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by March 2025.